ida-domain-scripting
Audited by Socket on Aug 15, 2026
3 alerts found:
SecurityAnomalyx2Purpose and capabilities are internally consistent: this is an IDA scripting skill for binary analysis, not a disguised credential harvester. Main concerns are its inherently high-risk offensive/reverse-engineering capability and the custom GitHub clone setup with optional mutable refs; supply-chain risk is moderate, while malicious intent is not evident.
No clear evidence of supply-chain malware or stealth sabotage in this fragment. The main security concern is that it intentionally executes user-provided Python code in a subprocess (wrapped or unwrapped) and can copy potentially modified IDA database artifacts back to the original target when `--save` is enabled. There are no obvious malicious network/exfiltration behaviors, hardcoded secrets, or obfuscation in the provided code.
No explicit malicious behavior (e.g., exfiltration/backdoors/credential theft) is evident in the shown fragment. However, the script performs high-impact supply-chain operations: it fetches remote code from GitHub based on a dynamic 'latest' tag or user-supplied ref, checks out that ref, installs it as an editable Python package, and then runs a Python one-liner for validation. Without commit pinning and without visible integrity/signature verification in this snippet, a compromised or malicious upstream ref could lead to arbitrary code execution during install/validation. Additionally, the validation payload (`test_script`) is truncated, so the exact execution content cannot be fully verified.