pre-submission-reviewer
Pre-Submission Reviewer
Overview
Three to five days before a submission deadline is the window where a careful external review pays off most. This skill takes a full paper or key sections and produces a structured review across five dimensions, each with severity-tagged findings and concrete rewrite suggestions. It enforces the mechanical rules from the writing-checklist section (no em-dashes, no banned AI-tone vocabulary, leading text per paragraph, topic-sentence discipline, citation-format uniformity) and surfaces the patterns that non-native English-speaking authors most commonly violate (articles, subject-verb agreement, tense consistency, which versus that, Chinglish phrasing).
The output is not a rewrite. It is a prioritised list of findings with severity tags; the author decides which to fix. CRITICAL items should block submission until addressed.
More from hkustdial/supervisor-skills
idea-evaluator
>-
23figure-designer
>-
23tech-paper-template
>-
23intro-drafter
>-
22vibe-research-workflow
>-
22benchmark-paper-template
Structures Benchmark and Evaluation papers using the five-pillar framework (Research Gap, Construction Pipeline, Evaluation Framework, Empirical Findings, optional Companion Method). Returns a completeness audit, a six-part Introduction logic chain, a Section 2-7 skeleton, and a pre-submission checklist. Use when writing a benchmark paper, structuring a benchmark paper, checking whether a benchmark idea is substantive, drafting a benchmark Introduction, or planning the data-construction pipeline or experiments.
22