subagent-driven-development

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jul 1, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEPROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONNO_CODE
Full Analysis
  • [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill exhibits an indirect prompt injection surface because it reads task-specific instructions from an external file and interpolates them directly into subagent prompts.
  • Ingestion points: Task names and requirements are read from a user-provided or session-local plan file in Step 1 and Step 2 (SKILL.md).
  • Boundary markers: The subagent prompt templates lack explicit delimiters (such as XML tags or triple backticks) or specific instructions to ignore malicious directives embedded within the task text.
  • Capability inventory: The subagents are granted capabilities to implement source code, write tests, and commit changes to the repository, which can be exploited if the plan file contains malicious instructions.
  • Sanitization: No input validation or filtering is performed on the content of the plan file before it is used to direct the agent's actions.
  • [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill workflow involves dynamic code generation and execution as part of its primary function.
  • Execution method: Subagents are instructed to write code and tests, then execute those tests to verify functionality (SKILL.md).
  • Risk factor: While standard for development agents, the execution of generated code based on external plan files inherits the risks of the indirect prompt injection surface.
  • [NO_CODE]: The skill package consists solely of markdown instructions and metadata, containing no standalone executable scripts, binaries, or configuration files that could hide malicious logic.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Jul 1, 2026, 06:02 AM
Security Audit — agent-trust-hub — subagent-driven-development