peer-review-methodology
Installation
SKILL.md
Scientific Peer Review
Overview
Peer review is a systematic process for evaluating scientific manuscripts and grant proposals. This knowhow covers the complete review cycle: from initial assessment through detailed section-by-section evaluation, statistical rigor checks, reproducibility assessment, figure integrity verification, ethical considerations, and writing quality — culminating in a structured review report with actionable feedback.
Key Concepts
1. Review Types and Expectations
| Review Type | Scope | Typical Length | Key Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original research | Full evaluation | 1–3 pages | Rigor, novelty, reproducibility |
| Review/Meta-analysis | Coverage and bias | 1–2 pages | Completeness, search strategy, systematic approach |
| Methods paper | Validation | 1–2 pages | Comparison to existing methods, reproducibility |
| Short communication | Proportional | 0.5–1 page | Core findings rigor despite brevity |
| Grant proposal | Feasibility + significance | 1–3 pages | Innovation, approach, team, budget justification |