nature-polishing

Pass

Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 30, 2026

Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONEXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS
Full Analysis
  • [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill processes untrusted user data, including academic manuscripts, Chinese-to-English drafts, LaTeX source code, and PDF files.\n
  • Ingestion points: User-provided prose text and PDF files (processed via libraries like pymupdf and pypdf) are the primary inputs for the polishing and layout diagnosis workflows.\n
  • Boundary markers: The instructions do not specify the use of boundary markers (e.g., XML tags or clear delimiters) to separate user content from system instructions during the analysis.\n
  • Capability inventory: The skill provides logic for restructuring text and suggests rendering/compiling operations for LaTeX documents and PDFs.\n
  • Sanitization: No explicit sanitization or instruction-filtering for the ingested academic text is mentioned to prevent embedded commands from being followed by the agent.\n- [EXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS]: The skill manifest and journal-specific fragments reference shared resources located outside the skill's primary folder.\n
  • Evidence: The manifest.yaml and static/fragments/journal/nat-comms.md reference files in a ../_shared/ directory structure (e.g., ../_shared/core/reader-workflow.md).\n
  • Context: These represent local infrastructure dependencies within the skill's author environment rather than remote downloads from untrusted third-party sources.
Audit Metadata
Risk Level
SAFE
Analyzed
Oct 30, 2026, 02:29 AM