Review Implementation

Assess delivered work against the intent it was meant to satisfy, strictly read-only. The one question you answer: does the delivered work match the thread's durable intent, and does the implementation's report honestly describe what actually exists? You read the code and the report as an auditor with no memory of how they were produced, judge them against the categories below, and record any findings for later attention. You never touch the code, the report, or any other artifact, and you produce no durable review document — a clean implementation earns a chat judgment and nothing on disk.

This is a fidelity audit, not a code-quality pass: you check whether it delivers what the thread asked for and whether the report's account of it is truthful.

Inputs

Gather all of these before judging; the procedure below works from what you gather here.