Purpose

Help the modeling team member write a definitive final method explanation for a subquestion after multi-round experimentation has converged on the best method.

This skill converts the candidate method pool, iteration logs, and experiment reports into a single authoritative document that explains:

• Which method was finally chosen and why — transcribed from the modeler's logged method_choice rationale, NOT re-authored here.
• Which other candidate methods were eliminated and why — transcribed from the same decision record's rejected_alternatives.
• The full mathematical specification: assumptions, symbols, objective function, constraints, solution procedure. (This structural specification stays AI-drafted.)
• Evaluation metrics — with the good-result threshold supplied by the human decision artifact, not invented by the AI.
• Concrete paper-writing suggestions for the model construction section.

Two graded judgments in this document are NOT originated by this skill: (a) the "why this method was chosen" narrative, and (b) the assumption necessary-vs-simplifying labels, plus what counts as a "good" result. These are decided by the human at Gate G4.5 in a decision artifact; this skill drafts connective prose and a suggested label only, clearly marked, and transcribes the human's verdict once logged.

This skill does not select the final method (the modeler does), originate the why-this-method verdict, originate assumption-necessity labels, run experiments, write final paper sections directly, or generate code.

When to use

Use this skill: