ux-audit
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jun 28, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEPROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill processes untrusted external data such as HTML snippets and UI component trees to perform its audit functions. Mandatory Evidence Chain: 1. Ingestion points: Audited UI code and interface descriptions entered during invocations (e.g., checkout page HTML in Case 3 of trigger-evals.json). 2. Boundary markers: Absent; the instructions do not mandate delimiters or warnings to ignore instructions embedded in audited data. 3. Capability inventory: The agent is instructed to write audit artifacts to the filesystem (docs/audits/ or audit-artifacts/). 4. Sanitization: Absent; no validation or escaping of the input content is performed before processing. This creates a surface for indirect prompt injection where malicious instructions hidden in audited code could influence the agent's output or report generation.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill package includes a shell script (evals/run-static-checks.sh) that utilizes bash, jq, and inline Python for static validation and integrity checks of the skill's own configuration and playbooks. While this script is intended for development-time verification and not for the agent's primary task execution, it represents an executable component within the skill structure.
- [SAFE]: The skill implements a structured workflow with clear boundaries, specifically avoiding developer-facing surfaces like APIs or CLIs. File-writing capabilities are strictly limited to recording audit results in specific directories with predefined filename patterns, and the skill does not perform unauthorized network requests or access sensitive credentials.
Audit Metadata