literature-review
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on May 29, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHREMOTE_CODE_EXECUTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONPROMPT_INJECTIONEXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS
Full Analysis
- [REMOTE_CODE_EXECUTION]: The documentation in
SKILL.mdinstructs users to install dependencies using a command that pipes a remote script directly to the shell:curl -fsSL https://parallel.ai/install.sh | bash. This method bypasses integrity checks and executes unverified code from a third-party server. - [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is susceptible to indirect prompt injection (Category 8) because it ingests untrusted data from external academic sources.
- Ingestion points: Data enters the environment via
parallel-cli searchresults andparallel-cli extractcalls which retrieve content from external URLs. - Boundary markers: The instructions lack delimiters or system prompts to isolate retrieved academic text from the agent's instructional context.
- Capability inventory: The skill utilizes
Bash(viasubprocess), file-write permissions, and network access across multiple scripts. - Sanitization: There is no evidence of sanitization or filtering applied to the content of papers or abstracts before they are processed for thematic synthesis.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The scripts
scripts/generate_pdf.pyandscripts/generate_schematic.pyutilize thesubprocessmodule to execute system binaries likepandocandxelatex. While these are used for document generation, they represent a high-privilege capability that could be abused if inputs are not strictly controlled. - [EXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS]: The skill performs extensive network operations, including fetching metadata from
api.crossref.org, resolving handles atdoi.org, and interacting withopenrouter.aifor AI services. This established network access could be leveraged for data exfiltration if combined with sensitive file access.
Recommendations
- HIGH: Downloads and executes remote code from: https://parallel.ai/install.sh - DO NOT USE without thorough review
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata