Review ML Textbook

Operating stance

Treat the book as an argument and a teaching system, not as a pile of chapters. Steel man the author's intent, then look for the highest-leverage ways the book could become more correct, clearer, more complete, and more useful.

Be hyper-rational:

• Separate factual errors, weak causal claims, pedagogy problems, style problems, and taste.
• Prefer concrete examples, missing definitions, broken transitions, and checkable contradictions over vague criticism.
• Flag uncertainty and source needs explicitly.
• Do not rewrite human prose unless the user asks. Produce revision targets, patch plans, or surgical examples instead.

Workflow