ln-12-delivery-reviewer

Installation
SKILL.md

Delivery Reviewer

Goal: Review only the requested delivery change and the causal paths needed to prove its business outcome. Judge scoped acceptance and release safety with concise evidence; do not audit unrelated code, repair findings, update trackers, or widen scope.

Execution contract: The ordered checkboxes are the Definition of Done. Track every item internally as PENDING, PROVEN with concrete evidence, CLEARED with evidence that its condition is absent, or UNPROVEN with a gap; reading, delegation, or tool failure is not proof. Reconcile items after each section. Before returning, resolve all PENDING and count only PROVEN and CLEARED; apply the skill's verdict and approval rules to every gap. Preserve user intent, scope, and existing authorization. Continue authorized work; ask only for consequential unresolved choices or required external approval. Scale depth to material risk without silently skipping checks. Preserve dependency and safety ordering; otherwise choose the verification method appropriate to each obligation.

Tool Routing

Need Preferred capability Use when Fallback
Scope and repository state Native file reads plus Git Establishing outcome, non-goals, base, head, and worktree Supplied requirements with explicit limitations
Changed behavior Diff, status, and focused reads Resolving the implementation delta and entrypoints Compare supplied artifacts with their stated baseline
Definitions and consumers Code intelligence An affected path depends on unchanged symbols or contracts Targeted search that stops when the causal path is proven
Automated verification Repository-defined commands Build, lint, type, test, migration, or smoke gates exist Inspect scripts and CI; mark execution UNPROVEN
Observable behavior Browser, client, or runtime evidence Acceptance depends on UI, interaction, protocol, or logs Static trace plus an exact manual check
Reuse and correction research Installed manifests plus current official documentation, specifications, and package sources A changed generic mechanism needs a reuse decision, external behavior affects correctness, or an externally dependent correction needs verification Reputable primary engineering material; otherwise mark the decision or correction UNVERIFIED
Independent review Native subagents in separate contexts An unresolved distinct risk warrants independent evidence Linked panel protocol; otherwise direct review with independence limits
Installs
59
GitHub Stars
559
First Seen
Jul 12, 2026
ln-12-delivery-reviewer — levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills