requesting-code-review
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 26, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill ingests untrusted data from the repository (code changes and plan documents) which could contain malicious instructions designed to influence the subagent's review verdict or actions.
- Ingestion points: The
{WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED},{PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS}, and{DESCRIPTION}placeholders incode-reviewer.mdingest external text, along with the source code retrieved viagit diff. - Boundary markers: The prompt template lacks clear delimiters or 'ignore embedded instructions' directives to separate the data being reviewed from the agent's core instructions.
- Capability inventory: The subagent has the capability to run shell commands (via
git) and its assessment directly guides the main agent's workflow (e.g., 'Fix Critical issues immediately'). - Sanitization: There is no evidence of sanitization or validation of the implementation descriptions or plan requirements before they are interpolated into the subagent's prompt.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill relies on shell-based git commands to identify commit ranges and perform diffs. In
code-reviewer.md, placeholders{BASE_SHA}and{HEAD_SHA}are interpolated directly into shell strings:git diff {BASE_SHA}..{HEAD_SHA}. If these variables are populated from untrusted input (such as a malicious branch name or user-provided reference) and not strictly validated as hexadecimal SHAs, they could be used to perform command injection.
Audit Metadata