blueprint
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 9, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill processes untrusted user input provided via arguments and propagates it through a multi-stage workflow.
- Ingestion points: Untrusted feature descriptions, bug reports, or ideas enter the skill through the
$ARGUMENTSvariable at the beginning of the workflow. - Boundary markers: While the input is initially encapsulated in
<feature_description>tags, it is subsequently interpolated into the prompts for sensitive sub-tasks, such asmajestic-engineer:plan:architectand various research agents, without robust delimitation or instructions to ignore embedded commands. - Capability inventory: The workflow possesses significant capabilities, including modifying the filesystem (
EditonAGENTS.md), executing shell commands (Bashfor plan previews), and creating/updating tasks. - Sanitization: There is no evidence of sanitization, filtering, or escaping applied to the user-provided text before it influences the behavior of downstream LLM-driven components.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill invokes a shell command to open generated documents, which could be exploited if the file path is manipulated.
- Evidence: The skill uses
Bash(command: "open {plan_path}")to provide a preview of the generated plan. - The
{plan_path}includes a title derived from the user-provided feature description. If the system does not strictly sanitize the strings used to generate filenames, an attacker could attempt to inject shell metacharacters into the description to influence the execution of theopencommand.
Audit Metadata