Adversarial Legal Review (English) - a red team for a high-stakes deliverable

Philosophy

Better your own agent finds the weakness in your thesis than your opponent finds it in the hearing.

A single LLM pass produces an argument that sounds confident - because the model is trained to sound confident. That is an illusion of competence. The real value of an expert is to foresee the counter-argument, the contrary authority, and the gap in reasoning before the other side does. This skill institutionalises the adversarial move: one agent defends, one attacks, one reconciles, one verifies.

This is NOT writing a deliverable from scratch. It is a stress-test of a finished deliverable.

Cost gate (read BEFORE running)

The full cycle is token-expensive. Run it only for high-stakes work: