tooluniverse-vaccine-design
Vaccine Design
Computational pipeline for designing peptide/subunit vaccine candidates through epitope prediction, population coverage optimization, and immunogenicity assessment.
Reasoning Strategy
Vaccine design requires presenting the right epitopes to elicit protective immunity — not just any immune response, but one that is neutralizing, durable, and broadly applicable. For T-cell vaccines, the core tool is MHC binding prediction (IEDB tools): predict peptide-MHC affinity across multiple HLA alleles, then select epitopes with broad coverage of the target population. For antibody vaccines, prioritize surface-exposed conserved regions — a deeply buried or hypervariable region makes a poor antibody target. MHC binding does not equal immunogenicity; many good binders are not immunogenic in vivo due to tolerance, poor processing, or lack of T-cell help. A multi-epitope strategy (combining MHC-I for CD8+ CTL response, MHC-II for CD4+ helper response, and B-cell epitopes for antibody induction) is more robust than any single epitope. Conservation across pathogen strains is critical — an epitope that mutates under immune pressure (like HIV envelope hypervariable regions) is a poor vaccine target.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Do not predict MHC binding or population coverage from memory — use IEDB_predict_mhci_binding and IEDB_predict_mhcii_binding for predictions and IEDB_search_epitopes for validated experimental data. Do not assume what's on the pathogen surface; retrieve annotated sequences from UniProt or BVBRC.
Key principles:
- Epitope-driven — vaccines work by presenting epitopes to T/B cells; start with epitope prediction
- Population coverage matters — HLA diversity means no single epitope covers everyone; design for breadth
- Multi-epitope is better — combine CD8+ (MHC-I) and CD4+ (MHC-II) epitopes for robust immunity
- Conservation = broad protection — conserved epitopes across strains provide cross-protective immunity
- Evidence grading — T1: clinical trial data, T2: in-vivo immunogenicity, T3: in-vitro binding, T4: computational prediction only
More from mims-harvard/tooluniverse
tooluniverse-sequence-retrieval
Retrieves biological sequences (DNA, RNA, protein) from NCBI and ENA with gene disambiguation, accession type handling, and comprehensive sequence profiles. Creates detailed reports with sequence metadata, cross-database references, and download options. Use when users need nucleotide sequences, protein sequences, genome data, or mention GenBank, RefSeq, EMBL accessions.
1.4Ktooluniverse-image-analysis
Production-ready microscopy image analysis and quantitative imaging data skill for colony morphometry, cell counting, fluorescence quantification, and statistical analysis of imaging-derived measurements. Processes ImageJ/CellProfiler output (area, circularity, intensity, cell counts), performs Dunnett's test, Cohen's d effect size, power analysis, Shapiro-Wilk normality tests, two-way ANOVA, polynomial regression, natural spline regression with confidence intervals, and comparative morphometry. Supports CSV/TSV measurement tables, multi-channel fluorescence data, colony swarming assays, and neuron counting datasets. Use when analyzing microscopy measurement data, colony area/circularity, cell count statistics, swarming assays, co-culture ratio optimization, or answering questions about imaging-derived quantitative data.
405tooluniverse-literature-deep-research
Comprehensive literature deep research across any academic domain using 120+ ToolUniverse tools. Conducts subject disambiguation, systematic literature search with citation network expansion, evidence grading (T1-T4), and structured theme extraction. Produces detailed reports with mandatory completeness checklists, integrated models, and testable hypotheses. Use when users need thorough literature reviews, target/drug/disease profiles, topic deep-dives, claim verification, or systematic evidence synthesis. Supports biomedical (genes, proteins, drugs, diseases), computer science, social science, and general academic topics. For single factoid questions, uses a fast verification mode with inline answer.
382tooluniverse
Router skill for ToolUniverse tasks. First checks if specialized tooluniverse skills (105+ skills covering disease/drug/target research, gene-disease associations, clinical decision support, genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, comparative genomics, chemical safety, toxicology, systems biology, and more) can solve the problem, then falls back to general strategies for using 2300+ scientific tools. Covers tool discovery, multi-hop queries, comprehensive research workflows, disambiguation, evidence grading, and report generation. Use when users need to research any scientific topic, find biological data, or explore drug/target/disease relationships. ALSO USE for any biology, medicine, chemistry, pharmacology, or life science question — even simple factoid questions like "how many X in protein Y", "what drug interacts with Z", "what gene causes disease W", or "translate this sequence". These questions benefit from database lookups (UniProt, PubMed, ChEMBL, ClinVar, GWAS Catalog, etc.) rather than answering from memory alone. When in doubt about a scientific fact, USE THIS SKILL to verify against real databases.
274tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design
Strategic clinical trial design feasibility assessment using ToolUniverse. Evaluates patient population sizing, biomarker prevalence, endpoint selection, comparator analysis, safety monitoring, and regulatory pathways. Creates comprehensive feasibility reports with evidence grading, enrollment projections, and trial design recommendations. Use when planning Phase 1/2 trials, assessing trial feasibility, or designing biomarker-driven studies.
270tooluniverse-drug-research
Generates comprehensive drug research reports with compound disambiguation, evidence grading, and mandatory completeness sections. Covers identity, chemistry, pharmacology, targets, clinical trials, safety, pharmacogenomics, and ADMET properties. Use when users ask about drugs, medications, therapeutics, or need drug profiling, safety assessment, or clinical development research.
270