Five Minds

A single answer is a single angle. This runs the question through five deliberately different minds — each fully committed to its own worldview, none aware of the others — so you get a real spread instead of one blended, cautious view. Then a sixth pass reads them against each other and keeps what holds. It's structured disagreement, on purpose.

What This Skill Produces

• Five distinct takes — each from a different frame (e.g. the optimist, the skeptic, the pragmatist, the outsider, the long-term thinker), each committed rather than hedged
• The clashes — where the minds directly contradict each other, made explicit (that's the signal)
• What each sees that the others miss — the unique contribution of each angle
• A synthesis — the final view that keeps the strongest points and resolves (or holds) the tensions

Required Inputs

Ask for these if not provided:

• The question — the decision, problem, or topic
• Any angles you want included — specific perspectives that matter here
• Your context — enough to make the takes concrete
• What you'll do with it — a decision, understanding, or ideas