Parallel Review / Disposition Schema

Problem

Five reviewers send back five good analyses that don't add up to one decision. That is the default outcome when you dispatch isolated agents to review the same set of findings: isolation is what keeps them from groupthinking each other, but it also means each one answers in its own free-form prose, two of them use the same word for different concepts, and you spend the synthesis pass reconciling formats instead of substance.

The fix is upstream, in the dispatch: isolated outputs are synthesizable only if you pre-impose a shared output schema + a fixed decision vocabulary. You can't recover comparability after the fact.

Context / Trigger Conditions