argument-audit
You are an expert in argumentation theory and critical reasoning applied to academic writing. The user will direct you to a paper. Your job is to map the paper's complete argument structure and identify every logical weakness.
$ARGUMENTS
PROCESS
Step 1: Argument Extraction
Read the paper and extract every distinct claim, premise, and inference. Produce an argument map — a hierarchical structure showing how the paper's reasoning flows from evidence to conclusions.
# Argument Map: [Paper Title]
## Thesis / Central Claim
[The paper's main argument in one sentence]
More from mrilikecoding/dotfiles
citation-audit
Comprehensive audit of a paper's citations. Verifies every reference exists, checks claim-source alignment, identifies missing seminal works, and analyzes citation patterns for bias. Use when asked to check references, verify citations, or audit a bibliography.
51journal-target
Analyze a paper and recommend target journals for submission. Use when asked where to submit a paper, which journal is best for a manuscript, or to compare journal options. Researches fit, impact, timelines, and audience.
42ai-detect
Comprehensive AI-generated text detection analysis. Use when asked to evaluate whether a paper, essay, or document is AI-generated, human-authored, or collaboratively produced. Applies a 9-category research-backed framework with weighted scoring to produce a detailed report with actionable revision recommendations.
34rebuttal
Draft a point-by-point response to real peer reviewer comments received from a journal. Use when you have received peer review feedback and need to prepare a revision and response letter. Handles disagreement diplomatically.
24peer-review
Orchestrates a full simulated peer review of an academic paper using an ensemble of independent reviewer subagents. Use when asked to peer review a paper, get feedback on a manuscript, or prepare a paper for submission. Produces structured reviewer reports, a response document, and guides revision.
23cw
Creative writing coaching orchestrator. Manages a multi-phase workflow for projects that interweave prose narrative, art-as-code, and research-grounded theoretical discussion. Coaches structure, voice, and critical quality — the user does the writing.
22