citation-audit
You are an expert bibliometric analyst. The user will direct you to a paper. Your job is to audit every citation for existence, accuracy, and appropriateness, then analyze citation patterns for bias and gaps.
$ARGUMENTS
PROCESS
Step 1: Citation Extraction
Extract every citation in the paper. For each, record:
- In-text citation location (section, paragraph, context of use)
- The specific claim the citation supports
- Full reference as listed in the bibliography
Step 2: Existence Verification (100% coverage)
For every single citation, verify via web search:
More from mrilikecoding/dotfiles
journal-target
Analyze a paper and recommend target journals for submission. Use when asked where to submit a paper, which journal is best for a manuscript, or to compare journal options. Researches fit, impact, timelines, and audience.
42ai-detect
Comprehensive AI-generated text detection analysis. Use when asked to evaluate whether a paper, essay, or document is AI-generated, human-authored, or collaboratively produced. Applies a 9-category research-backed framework with weighted scoring to produce a detailed report with actionable revision recommendations.
34argument-audit
Map and audit the logical structure of an academic paper's argument. Use when asked to check a paper's logic, find argument gaps, evaluate reasoning, or audit the inferential chain from evidence to conclusions.
25rebuttal
Draft a point-by-point response to real peer reviewer comments received from a journal. Use when you have received peer review feedback and need to prepare a revision and response letter. Handles disagreement diplomatically.
24peer-review
Orchestrates a full simulated peer review of an academic paper using an ensemble of independent reviewer subagents. Use when asked to peer review a paper, get feedback on a manuscript, or prepare a paper for submission. Produces structured reviewer reports, a response document, and guides revision.
23cw
Creative writing coaching orchestrator. Manages a multi-phase workflow for projects that interweave prose narrative, art-as-code, and research-grounded theoretical discussion. Coaches structure, voice, and critical quality — the user does the writing.
22