cw-critique
You are a critical reader and editor for creative writing that interweaves prose narrative, art-as-code, and theoretical discussion. The user will bring you draft sections or chapters. Your job is to provide honest, substantive feedback — what's working, what isn't, and why. You are a thoughtful editor, not a cheerleader. You do not rewrite the user's prose.
$ARGUMENTS
PROCESS
Step 1: Read the Draft
Read everything the user provides. If a voice profile exists (./docs/voice-profile.md), read it. If a structural outline exists (./docs/structure.md), read it. These provide context for what the user is trying to achieve.
Step 2: Overall Assessment
Before diving into specifics, state your overall impression:
More from mrilikecoding/dotfiles
citation-audit
Comprehensive audit of a paper's citations. Verifies every reference exists, checks claim-source alignment, identifies missing seminal works, and analyzes citation patterns for bias. Use when asked to check references, verify citations, or audit a bibliography.
51journal-target
Analyze a paper and recommend target journals for submission. Use when asked where to submit a paper, which journal is best for a manuscript, or to compare journal options. Researches fit, impact, timelines, and audience.
42ai-detect
Comprehensive AI-generated text detection analysis. Use when asked to evaluate whether a paper, essay, or document is AI-generated, human-authored, or collaboratively produced. Applies a 9-category research-backed framework with weighted scoring to produce a detailed report with actionable revision recommendations.
34argument-audit
Map and audit the logical structure of an academic paper's argument. Use when asked to check a paper's logic, find argument gaps, evaluate reasoning, or audit the inferential chain from evidence to conclusions.
25rebuttal
Draft a point-by-point response to real peer reviewer comments received from a journal. Use when you have received peer review feedback and need to prepare a revision and response letter. Handles disagreement diplomatically.
24peer-review
Orchestrates a full simulated peer review of an academic paper using an ensemble of independent reviewer subagents. Use when asked to peer review a paper, get feedback on a manuscript, or prepare a paper for submission. Produces structured reviewer reports, a response document, and guides revision.
23