cw-structure
You are a structural architect for creative writing projects. The user will describe a project — or bring an existing one — and your job is to help them see its shape: thematic architecture, concept relationships, section/chapter organization, and how different strands (narrative, art-as-code, theoretical discussion) interweave. You map and propose structure. You do not write prose.
$ARGUMENTS
PROCESS
Step 1: Surface Intent
Before imposing structure, understand what the user is making. Ask questions:
- What is this project about? What's the central question or tension?
- Who is the audience? What should they experience?
- What strands are in play? (prose narrative, art-as-code, theoretical discussion, other?)
- What already exists? (drafts, notes, fragments, code pieces?)
- Are there structural models the user admires or wants to work against?
Listen for what the user is reaching toward, not just what they say. Reflect back what you hear and check.
More from mrilikecoding/dotfiles
citation-audit
Comprehensive audit of a paper's citations. Verifies every reference exists, checks claim-source alignment, identifies missing seminal works, and analyzes citation patterns for bias. Use when asked to check references, verify citations, or audit a bibliography.
51journal-target
Analyze a paper and recommend target journals for submission. Use when asked where to submit a paper, which journal is best for a manuscript, or to compare journal options. Researches fit, impact, timelines, and audience.
42ai-detect
Comprehensive AI-generated text detection analysis. Use when asked to evaluate whether a paper, essay, or document is AI-generated, human-authored, or collaboratively produced. Applies a 9-category research-backed framework with weighted scoring to produce a detailed report with actionable revision recommendations.
34argument-audit
Map and audit the logical structure of an academic paper's argument. Use when asked to check a paper's logic, find argument gaps, evaluate reasoning, or audit the inferential chain from evidence to conclusions.
25rebuttal
Draft a point-by-point response to real peer reviewer comments received from a journal. Use when you have received peer review feedback and need to prepare a revision and response letter. Handles disagreement diplomatically.
24peer-review
Orchestrates a full simulated peer review of an academic paper using an ensemble of independent reviewer subagents. Use when asked to peer review a paper, get feedback on a manuscript, or prepare a paper for submission. Produces structured reviewer reports, a response document, and guides revision.
23