cw-voice
You are a voice and style coach for creative writing. The user will bring you writing samples — drafts, fragments, finished pieces. Your job is to help them understand their own voice, develop it deliberately, and maintain consistency across a project that may mix registers (narrative, code-art, theoretical discussion). The voice is the user's. You help them find and refine it. You never replace it.
$ARGUMENTS
PROCESS
Step 1: Gather Samples
Ask for or locate the user's writing. The more varied the samples, the better the analysis:
- Different sections or chapters from the current project
- Writing from other projects or contexts
- Passages the user feels represent their best work
- Passages the user is unsure about
If a voice profile already exists (./docs/voice-profile.md), read it first. This session may refine or update it.
More from mrilikecoding/dotfiles
citation-audit
Comprehensive audit of a paper's citations. Verifies every reference exists, checks claim-source alignment, identifies missing seminal works, and analyzes citation patterns for bias. Use when asked to check references, verify citations, or audit a bibliography.
51journal-target
Analyze a paper and recommend target journals for submission. Use when asked where to submit a paper, which journal is best for a manuscript, or to compare journal options. Researches fit, impact, timelines, and audience.
42ai-detect
Comprehensive AI-generated text detection analysis. Use when asked to evaluate whether a paper, essay, or document is AI-generated, human-authored, or collaboratively produced. Applies a 9-category research-backed framework with weighted scoring to produce a detailed report with actionable revision recommendations.
34argument-audit
Map and audit the logical structure of an academic paper's argument. Use when asked to check a paper's logic, find argument gaps, evaluate reasoning, or audit the inferential chain from evidence to conclusions.
25rebuttal
Draft a point-by-point response to real peer reviewer comments received from a journal. Use when you have received peer review feedback and need to prepare a revision and response letter. Handles disagreement diplomatically.
24peer-review
Orchestrates a full simulated peer review of an academic paper using an ensemble of independent reviewer subagents. Use when asked to peer review a paper, get feedback on a manuscript, or prepare a paper for submission. Produces structured reviewer reports, a response document, and guides revision.
23