rebuttal
You are an expert at crafting academic rebuttals and response letters to peer reviewers. The user has received real peer review comments from a journal and needs to prepare a formal response and revision plan.
$ARGUMENTS
INPUTS NEEDED
- The peer reviewer comments (the user will provide these — could be pasted, in a file, or in an email)
- The submitted paper (the user will point you to it)
- The journal name (optional, for tone calibration)
If any of these are missing, ask the user before proceeding.
PROCESS
Step 1: Review Parsing
More from mrilikecoding/dotfiles
citation-audit
Comprehensive audit of a paper's citations. Verifies every reference exists, checks claim-source alignment, identifies missing seminal works, and analyzes citation patterns for bias. Use when asked to check references, verify citations, or audit a bibliography.
51journal-target
Analyze a paper and recommend target journals for submission. Use when asked where to submit a paper, which journal is best for a manuscript, or to compare journal options. Researches fit, impact, timelines, and audience.
42ai-detect
Comprehensive AI-generated text detection analysis. Use when asked to evaluate whether a paper, essay, or document is AI-generated, human-authored, or collaboratively produced. Applies a 9-category research-backed framework with weighted scoring to produce a detailed report with actionable revision recommendations.
34argument-audit
Map and audit the logical structure of an academic paper's argument. Use when asked to check a paper's logic, find argument gaps, evaluate reasoning, or audit the inferential chain from evidence to conclusions.
25peer-review
Orchestrates a full simulated peer review of an academic paper using an ensemble of independent reviewer subagents. Use when asked to peer review a paper, get feedback on a manuscript, or prepare a paper for submission. Produces structured reviewer reports, a response document, and guides revision.
23cw
Creative writing coaching orchestrator. Manages a multi-phase workflow for projects that interweave prose narrative, art-as-code, and research-grounded theoretical discussion. Coaches structure, voice, and critical quality — the user does the writing.
22