ask
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jul 29, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHCOMMAND_EXECUTIONPROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill defines shell commands for interacting with local CLIs using the pattern
claude -p "{{ARGUMENTS}}"andgemini -p "{{ARGUMENTS}}". These commands interpolate user-provided data directly into a shell execution context without any visible sanitization or escaping mechanisms.\n- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The use of shell interpolation for untrusted user input allows for arbitrary command execution. A malicious user or an indirect prompt injection could provide input containing shell metacharacters (e.g.,;,&,|,`,$()) to break out of the intended command and execute unauthorized processes or access sensitive files on the host system.\n- [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill lack explicit boundary markers or instructions for the agent to treat{{ARGUMENTS}}as untrusted data. This makes it highly susceptible to indirect prompt injection where data processed by the agent could contain shell-escape payloads.\n- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: Mandatory Evidence Chain for Indirect Injection Risk:\n - Ingestion points:
{{ARGUMENTS}}variable inSKILL.mdused in shell command templates.\n - Boundary markers: Absent; no delimiters or "ignore instructions" warnings are present around the user input placeholder.\n
- Capability inventory: Execution of arbitrary shell commands via
claudeandgeminibinaries, and file-write capabilities to the.omw/ask/directory.\n - Sanitization: Absent; the skill does not specify any validation, filtering, or escaping for the interpolated arguments.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata