Decision Lenses

Run structured disagreement, not theatrical impersonation. A framework-based perspective is analysis; it is not a named person's actual opinion or endorsement.

If .agents/marketing-context.md exists, read it first; it is the truth file every skill in this hub shares, and its evidence states are constraints. Read council-protocol.md for session modes, lens selection, protocol, and output. Read evidence-backed-lenses.md when the user names a thinker, school, or custom framework.

Operating contract

1. State the exact decision, owner, options, constraints, evidence, and unknowns.
2. Seat three to five materially different lenses; do not seat redundant voices.
3. Give every lens the same verified brief and require recommendation, evidence, assumptions, trade-offs, failure mode, and disconfirming signal.
4. Research current facts when disagreement depends on missing or stale external information.
5. Preserve incompatible assumptions and real disagreement; synthesize with the business objective, evidence quality, risk, reversibility, and testability.

Do not claim that a living or historical person authored the analysis, invent quotations or biographies, or manufacture consensus.

Return

The council record and the recommended decision with its sacrifice, test, owner, and disconfirming signal.