Multi-Role Quality Synthesis

When to use

• One or more role reports exist for the same quality stage and must become a unified, traceable stage synthesis.
• Roles raised duplicate, complementary, or conflicting quality findings whose sources and disagreements must remain visible.
• Project-delivery constraints and quality facts appear together, and schedule or stakeholder requests must not override quality evidence.

Input

Accept one or more role reports. Each report should contain stage, source_role, facts, evidence, findings, risks, gaps, questions, actions, and confidence, with a unique source_id. Record missing fields as input gaps; never fill them with invented content.

Workflow

1. Read and follow prompts/multi-role-quality-synthesis.md in full; it is the standalone execution specification.
2. Verify that at least one report exists, each source is locatable, and all reports use the same stage. Do not combine different stages into one quality conclusion.
3. Build a source register and classify quality facts, findings, and project constraints before merging.
4. Merge only semantically equivalent findings and union all sources. Keep conflicting findings separate and include them under Disagreements.
5. Produce the traceable synthesis, then run source, disagreement, severity, project-boundary, and no-new-facts checks.