PRECISE: Prediction-Powered Ranking Estimation for Debiased LLM Evaluation

This skill enables Claude to implement the PRECISE statistical framework for evaluating search, ranking, and RAG systems. Instead of relying solely on expensive human annotations or biased LLM judgments, PRECISE combines ~100 human-annotated queries with ~10,000 LLM-judged queries using Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI) to produce unbiased metric estimates with valid confidence intervals. The technique corrects systematic LLM-judge bias while reducing annotation costs by 95%.

When to Use

• When the user needs to evaluate a search or retrieval system but cannot afford to annotate thousands of query-result pairs by hand
• When the user has LLM-generated relevance labels (from GPT-4, Claude, etc.) and wants to correct for their systematic bias
• When computing Precision@K, nDCG, or other ranking metrics and the user wants confidence intervals, not just point estimates
• When the user is running an A/B test on a query reformulation, reranking, or RAG pipeline and needs reliable uplift estimates from minimal human labels
• When the user asks how many human annotations are needed to trust LLM-based evaluation
• When building an evaluation pipeline that mixes human and automated relevance judgments

Key Technique

Prediction-Powered Inference (PPI) is a statistical framework that treats LLM predictions as a noisy proxy for human labels and uses a small "gold" set of human annotations to estimate and correct the bias. The PRECISE estimator is: