six-pager
/six-pager -- Amazon-style Narrative Memo and PRFAQ
Generate decision documents in the format Amazon has used since June 9, 2004 — when Bezos banned PowerPoint and required every meeting to open with a written narrative.
This skill produces the document. It does not replace the discipline. The original Amazon practice takes a week (draft → review → set aside → edit → final). The skill compresses the structure but preserves the prose-quality bar.
Why This Works
Three independent traditions converge on a single principle: writing is the thinking instrument, not the documentation of it.
- Bezos (Amazon, 2004): "There is no way to write a six-page narratively structured memo and not have clear thinking."
- Strunk (1918, restated by E.B. White 1959): "Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts." (Rule 17)
- Anthropic (Claude Code Best Practices): "For every line, ask: If I removed this, would Claude make a mistake? If not, remove it."
Same rule, three scales: line, sentence, instruction. This skill enforces all three.
When to Use This vs Sibling Skills
More from ngmeyer/skills
skillforge
Forge new Claude Code skills or optimize existing ones to V2. Two modes — `forge` scaffolds a new skill (frontmatter, progressive disclosure, helper scripts, mandatory Gotchas, iterate-then-extract); `optimize` makes an existing skill measurably better at its OUTCOME, not just its packaging (quality audit + domain outcome-research + changelog + V1-vs-V2 verification). Use when the user wants to create, write, build, scaffold, improve, upgrade, or optimize a skill.
1session-close
>
1claude-md
>
1session-recover
>
1council-review
Run any question, plan, PR, or code through a Diverse Multi-Agent Debate (DMAD) council of 5 AI advisors with distinct reasoning methods. Advisors collaborate, peer-review each other anonymously, and a chairman synthesizes a verdict. Empirically outperforms adversarial debate (M3MADBench 2026, DMAD ICLR 2025). Use when: 'council this', 'run the council', 'council review', 'pressure-test this', 'stress-test this', 'war room this', or when facing a genuine decision with stakes and tradeoffs.
1adversarial-review
>
1