doc-quality-review
Documentation Quality Review
Assess whether documentation is well-written, consistent, and appropriate for its audience. The output is a scored review with specific findings — not rewrites.
When to Use
- Before releases — ensure docs meet a quality bar
- During doc review — structured alternative to "looks good to me"
- When users report docs are confusing, inconsistent, or too technical
- After bulk doc generation — verify machine-written docs read naturally
- Periodic quality check on documentation health
Quick Reference
| Resource | Purpose | Load when |
|---|---|---|
references/quality-dimensions.md |
Scoring rubrics for each dimension | Always (Phase 1) |
references/style-checklist.md |
Concrete style rules for common issues | Phase 2 (review pass) |
More from nickcrew/claude-cortex
owasp-top-10
OWASP Top 10 security vulnerabilities with detection and remediation patterns. Use when conducting security audits, implementing secure coding practices, or reviewing code for common security vulnerabilities.
10codanna-codebase-intelligence
Use codanna MCP tools for semantic code search, call graphs, and impact analysis before grep/find.
4mermaid-diagramming
>-
3python-testing-patterns
Python testing patterns and best practices using pytest, mocking, and property-based testing. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or implementing test-driven development in Python projects.
3tutorial-design
>-
2python-performance-optimization
Python performance optimization patterns using profiling, algorithmic improvements, and acceleration techniques. Use when optimizing slow Python code, reducing memory usage, or improving application throughput and latency.
2