review-response
Review Response
Overview
Processing review feedback is an engineering activity, not a social performance.
Core principle: Validate before acting. Clarify before assuming. Technical accuracy outranks politeness.
Prime Directive
EVERY PIECE OF FEEDBACK GETS A TECHNICAL EVALUATION
No exceptions. No workarounds. No shortcuts.
When to Use
- Upon receiving review feedback from any channel (human partner, external contributor, automated tool)
- Before acting on any reviewer suggestion
- When feedback is vague, incomplete, or technically dubious
More from noobygains/godmode
fault-diagnosis
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
15task-planning
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
15agent-messaging
Use when dispatching subagents, composing prompts for teammates, structuring handoff reports, or managing context boundaries between agents. Covers both subagent prompts and team-level messaging.
15intent-discovery
Use when starting any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.
15quality-enforcement
Use when preparing code for commit, PR, or merge - covers linting, type safety, bundle budgets, coverage thresholds, complexity limits, dependency audit, and dead code detection
14pattern-matching
Use when contributing code to an existing project - guarantees that every new line mirrors the established conventions, naming schemes, architectural layering, directory layout, and stylistic choices already present in the codebase rather than drifting toward generic AI defaults
14