Research review

Review original evidence, not another assistant's confidence.

Steps

Collect the decision, original sources, draft, and input version. Assign stable claim IDs. If an original source is missing, mark dependent claims unresolved.
Run a researcher pass to make a claim ledger with source passages and calculations. Preserve the original packet with the draft so review can reconstruct the result.
Run a reviewer pass against original inputs. Recompute rates and totals; check populations, time windows, missing data, causal language, and the recommendation's scope.
Return one consolidated set of corrections, identified by claim ID. Revise once, keep a change log, and check the changed claims again. Escalate unresolved disagreement rather than looping indefinitely.
If separate assistants are available, use them only within approved source-sharing scope. Otherwise use two labeled passes in the same conversation and state that review is not independent validation.

Version | claim | source | supported/incorrect/unresolved | correction; revised memo and unresolved decisions.