Food-Review — Multi-Reviewer Peer Review for Food & Nutrition Manuscripts

Give the author the review a good food-science journal would return, from a panel rather than a single voice. Original work; architecture informed by open community peer-review skills (see the repo README Acknowledgements).

Modes

• full (default) — the whole panel: three domain reviewers + devil's advocate + format check, synthesized by the coordinator into an editorial decision.
• quick — coordinator + one blended reviewer pass; a fast readiness verdict.
• methodology — deep dive by reviewer_methodology only.
• re-review — re-assess a revised manuscript against the prior reports and the author's response, verifying each point was addressed.