mold
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 17, 2026
Risk Level: SAFECOMMAND_EXECUTIONINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONDATA_EXFILTRATION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill frequently executes a local Python utility bundle to perform validation and artifact management.\n
- Evidence: Calls to
python3 skills/mold/scripts/mold.pyzappear throughout the workflow (e.g., inSKILL.mdandreferences/commands.md) for tasks liketaste-test,artifact-path,validate-spec, andpublish.\n- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to ingest and process data from external sources, which presents a surface for indirect prompt injection. However, it incorporates robust mitigations.\n - Ingestion points: External data enters the agent context through wiki probes (
references/grounding.md), search results via sub-agents (references/context-budget.md), and codebase exploration.\n - Boundary markers: The skill uses a 'Scope audit table' and a 'Provenance' section to distinguish between user-provided data and agent-derived synthesis.\n
- Capability inventory: The skill can write files (
Curdlephase), perform network requests (publishcommand,briesearchtool), and interact with GitHub (ghCLI).\n - Sanitization: It employs a 'Scope audit' procedure that verifies all distinguishing nouns in the output against the user's original input (via grep) and requires a human-in-the-loop 'Two-key handshake' before any artifacts are finalized.\n- [DATA_EXFILTRATION]: The skill performs legitimate network operations to publish plans and create follow-up issues.\n
- Evidence: The
publishcommand and thegh issue createintegration (documented inreferences/curdle.md) are used to send approved specifications and task drafts to external platforms.
Audit Metadata