auto-improvement
Overview
The auto-improvement skill implements a self-improving feedback loop that tracks effectiveness metrics, learns from errors, identifies recurring failure patterns, and adapts workflows to prevent repeated mistakes. It enables the agent to become measurably better over time through structured self-assessment rather than ad-hoc adjustments. Without this skill, the same mistakes repeat across sessions — with it, every error becomes a permanent improvement.
This skill is ALWAYS active. It runs automatically on every session and cannot be disabled.
Phase 1: Metric Collection
At the start of every task, instrument key decision points:
- Record task start time and initial estimate
- Define expected outcome and success criteria
- Track each decision point (approach chosen, alternatives considered)
- Log revision count (how many times the output was revised)
- Track user corrections as improvement signals
Core Metrics
More from pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
ui-ux-pro-max
>
784frontend-ui-design
Use when designing UI components, creating component architectures, implementing responsive layouts, setting up design systems, or selecting state management solutions for frontend applications
43reverse-engineering-specs
Use when onboarding to an existing codebase that lacks specifications — exhaustively traces code paths and produces implementation-free behavioral specifications for safe refactoring, feature addition, or legacy modernization
40senior-fullstack
Use when the user needs end-to-end TypeScript development — from database schema through API layer to UI — with tRPC, Prisma, Next.js, authentication, and deployment. Triggers: full-stack feature implementation, database-to-UI pipeline, tRPC router creation, Prisma schema design, auth setup, deployment configuration.
35ux-researcher-designer
>
35clean-code
Use when the user needs code quality review, refactoring guidance, SOLID principles application, or help identifying and fixing code smells. Triggers: code smell detection, refactoring planning, naming convention review, complexity reduction, DRY analysis, error handling improvement.
35