subagent-driven-development
Subagent-Driven Development
Overview
This skill orchestrates implementation through dedicated subagents with built-in quality gates. Each task is implemented by an implementer subagent, then reviewed by two specialized reviewer agents (spec compliance and code quality) before acceptance. Failed reviews trigger iterative fix cycles with a maximum of 3 retries before escalation. This ensures consistent quality at scale while maximizing parallel throughput.
Announce at start: "I'm using the subagent-driven-development skill to dispatch implementation tasks with two-stage review gates."
Trigger Conditions
- Plan has 3+ tasks that can be implemented independently
- Tasks have well-specified acceptance criteria suitable for delegation
- Speed of execution is a priority
- Tasks have few interdependencies
- Quality gates are needed for delegated work
Phase 1: Task Preparation
More from pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
ui-ux-pro-max
>
784frontend-ui-design
Use when designing UI components, creating component architectures, implementing responsive layouts, setting up design systems, or selecting state management solutions for frontend applications
43reverse-engineering-specs
Use when onboarding to an existing codebase that lacks specifications — exhaustively traces code paths and produces implementation-free behavioral specifications for safe refactoring, feature addition, or legacy modernization
40senior-fullstack
Use when the user needs end-to-end TypeScript development — from database schema through API layer to UI — with tRPC, Prisma, Next.js, authentication, and deployment. Triggers: full-stack feature implementation, database-to-UI pipeline, tRPC router creation, Prisma schema design, auth setup, deployment configuration.
35ux-researcher-designer
>
35clean-code
Use when the user needs code quality review, refactoring guidance, SOLID principles application, or help identifying and fixing code smells. Triggers: code smell detection, refactoring planning, naming convention review, complexity reduction, DRY analysis, error handling improvement.
35