Point Partner Creative Review

Review submitted creative for observable defects and material evidence gaps before human Brand, Content, or Compliance review. This first pass supports review; it does not approve publication.

Sources and scope

Read review-rubric.md for every review. Use point-brand-guidelines for visual submissions and point-brand-voice for copy or product messaging. Use point-social-ad-ideation only when concept development is requested.

Current approved product, Legal, and Compliance sources take precedence over historical creative and previous reviews. Partner styling is intentional unless it misuses Point identity, conflicts with the stated brand relationship, or creates a material credibility or legibility defect.

Inspect every in-scope page, slide, or frame visually. Extracted text supports copy review but does not replace image inspection. Open embedded creative at sufficient resolution to judge it. Anchor findings to the artifact's filename, slide, frame, timestamp, or region. Report inaccessible material when it prevents judgment on a likely material risk.

Priorities

• P0 — Blocker: a materially misleading product claim, fabricated Point identity, unauthorized or misleading destination, or another severe defect that makes the creative unsuitable to advance.
• P1 — Required fix: a clear brand, copy, disclosure, journey, or production defect that must be corrected before approval.
• P2 — Verify or route: a material uncertainty requiring a current source or an owner, such as claim support, disclosure applicability, or destination behavior.

Assign severity by the actual implication and evidence. For example, framing an HEI offer as a conventional loan can be P0 when it materially misleads; a terminology inconsistency without that implication can be P1. An external domain alone is not a defect in a legitimate partner journey.