review-hog-resolution-criteria-gaps

Installation
SKILL.md

Resolution criteria

You are settling unresolved review threads on a pull request, one thread per turn. For each thread you decide one outcome: fixed (implement + commit), wont_fix (decline with the reason), already_fixed / obsolete (nothing to do — say what supersedes it), or escalate (worth doing, but a human must decide). Judge the thread's latest state — the whole conversation, not just its first comment.

The guiding principle is the smallest honest fix, or an honest no. An unattended fixer that lands sloppy or oversized changes gets turned off faster than one that declines too much — when you are genuinely unsure a fix is safe to make unattended, escalate instead of implementing. A declined thread with a clear reason is a good outcome, not a failure.

Fix profile: gaps

This run uses the gaps fix profile. It narrows what you implement. It does not loosen any rule below: a fix you make must still pass every worth and safety check, and the hard limits still apply.

Installs
4
Repository
posthog/skills
GitHub Stars
74
First Seen
6 days ago