solidity-gas-optimization

Warn

Audited by Socket on Sep 18, 2026

2 alerts found:

Anomalyx2
AnomalyLOW
references/rules/design-02-signatures-vs-merkle.md

The fragment is benign security-design documentation, not malware. The EIP-712 example is the strongest pattern shown. The basic signature and hybrid examples require hardening: add chain/contract domain separation, expiry or nonce controls where appropriate, and require `index < 256` before shifting in HybridClaim. Do not deploy the pseudocode without implementing claim accounting and securing the omitted mint/transfer logic.

Confidence: 98%Severity: 58%
AnomalyLOW
references/rules/crosscall-01-multicall.md

The code implements a conventional Solidity multicall pattern and shows no evidence of malware, data theft, backdoors, or supply-chain sabotage. It is not inherently malicious, but self-delegatecall and payable batching require careful integration: callers may compose arbitrary exposed functions, every subcall sees the full msg.value, and the examples lack reentrancy protection, authorization constraints, and recursion safeguards. The code should be reviewed in the context of the containing contract before deployment.

Confidence: 97%Severity: 58%
Audit Metadata
Analyzed At
Sep 18, 2026, 08:46 AM
Package URL
pkg:socket/skills-sh/pseudoyu%2Fagent-skills%2Fsolidity-gas-optimization%2F@ce82040af9222ea824595ca5f74779a2f580d1b5aefd437c4034d1924df3617a
Security Audit — socket — solidity-gas-optimization