Unbury

Turn exhaustive AI-style explanation into edited engineering communication. The reader is a technically competent engineer who does not yet know the situation. Every edit serves one measure:

How quickly does that reader build the correct mental model?

This is not "sound less like AI" and not "make it casual." The output should read like a strong engineer explaining something clearly to another strong engineer. Technical accuracy, necessary qualifications, and the artifact's native format all survive the edit.

The target is minimum cognitive load, not minimum word count. The rewrite may be much shorter, about the same length, or occasionally longer; all three are fine if the reader reaches the correct model faster and every decision-critical fact survives. One added sentence can lower the load when it saves the reader from inferring a consequence they needed. Do not use a compression percentage as a target.

Workflow