rebuttal
Pass
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Jul 18, 2026
Risk Level: SAFEPROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTIONDATA_EXFILTRATIONNO_CODE
Full Analysis
- [PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is susceptible to indirect prompt injection (Category 8) because it ingests raw external reviews which can contain malicious instructions intended to manipulate the agent's output.
- Ingestion points: Raw reviews are loaded into the environment in Phase 1 and Phase 2 (SKILL.md).
- Boundary markers: Review text is stored verbatim in
rebuttal/REVIEWS_RAW.mdbut lacks explicit boundary markers or instructions to ignore embedded commands during subsequent processing phases. - Capability inventory: The skill can execute
Bash(*)commands and invoke other agents or skills (e.g.,experiment-bridge). - Sanitization: No sanitization is performed on review contents before they are used to influence the drafting and strategy planning phases.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The workflow involves the execution of local shell commands via
Bash(*)and the potential invocation of the/experiment-bridgeskill to run supplementary experiments. This allows the agent to modify the local environment based on instructions derived from processed data, though it is gated by theAUTO_EXPERIMENTsetting. - [DATA_EXFILTRATION]: In Phase 6, the skill uses the
mcp__codex__codextool to stress-test the rebuttal draft. This process involves sending the paper source, raw reviews, and the draft to an external model (gpt-5.4), which represents a transfer of potentially sensitive research data to an external service provider. - [NO_CODE]: The skill consists of instructional logic within the Markdown body and does not include separate script files, executables, or binaries.
Audit Metadata