review
Perform a code review.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (optional scope)
- commit: Review only staged files for commit
- pr [number]: Review all files changed in the current PR (or specific PR number)
- all: Review the entire codebase
- If no argument provided:
- If in a PR branch: defaults to 'pr'
- Otherwise: defaults to 'commit'
Phase 1: Scope Determination
- Determine scope based on $ARGUMENTS
- If reviewing a PR, fetch PR details and linked issue with
gh pr viewandgh issue view
Phase 2: Review
- Run available linting tools for detected languages
- Check against project standards from CLAUDE.md (80 char limit, whitespace, naming)
- Review for: correctness, performance, security, maintainability, test coverage
- If PR: check alignment with target issue requirements and CI/CD status with
gh pr checks
More from seabbs/skills
analyzing-research-papers
Expert methodology for analyzing and summarizing research papers, extracting key contributions, methodological details, and contextualizing findings. Use when reading papers from PDFs, DOIs, or URLs to create structured summaries for researchers.
243academic-writing-standards
Expert knowledge of academic writing standards for peer-reviewed papers, including citation integrity, style compliance, clarity, and scientific writing best practices. Use when reviewing or editing academic manuscripts, papers, or research documentation.
64taskfile-automation
Expert guidance for using Task (taskfile.dev) automation tool to discover and execute project development commands
20issue-reply
Post a helpful reply to a GitHub issue
8paper-summary
Summarise an academic paper from URL, DOI, or file path
7literature-search
Search local bibliography files and Paperpile for relevant papers
7