what-could-break
Warn
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Oct 29, 2026
Risk Level: MEDIUMDYNAMIC_EXECUTIONINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTIONCOMMAND_EXECUTION
Full Analysis
- [DYNAMIC_EXECUTION]: The skill's core workflow requires the AI agent to dynamically generate and execute scripts on the local system to verify software hypotheses.
- Evidence: 'Step 5: Prove the one fact... Write the script or test that runs the real code, run it, and paste what happened.'
- Evidence: 'Rung 4 is usually one small script that imports the same module production runs and calls the exact function you are worried about.'
- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill is designed to ingest and analyze untrusted data from a codebase, which serves as the foundation for the scripts it eventually executes.
- Ingestion points: Source code files, 'git log' output, system prompts, agent files, and configuration schemas (SKILL.md).
- Boundary markers: Absent. The instructions do not specify the use of delimiters or warnings to ignore instructions embedded within the code being analyzed.
- Capability inventory: The agent is instructed to use its execution environment to run scripts that can import production modules, perform network operations, or modify files.
- Sanitization: Absent. There are no instructions for sanitizing or validating the symbols, field names, or logic extracted from the codebase before they are interpolated into the generated scripts.
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The skill requires the agent to perform extensive shell-based investigations of the repository history and structure.
- Evidence: Use of
git log -S,git log -L, andgrepcommands to trace symbols and function history.
Audit Metadata