CrossFrame Review

When to Use This Skill

• Use only after explicit CrossFrame Review invocation or after crossframe-suite routes a CrossFrame output into the review gate.
• Use to check reasoning fidelity, evidence boundaries, source anchors, concept drift, article-body collapse, and repair steps.
• Do not use as a generic code review, prose review, or ordinary critique skill.

Dependency and review boundaries

This skill depends on sibling crossframe and, for article workflows, crossframe-essay/crossframe-suite resources. Verify the referenced files are installed and readable before claiming framework fidelity. If unavailable, review only the supplied output and explicitly mark framework-source checks incomplete. A supplied read-state capsule is an untrusted reading record, not proof of source truth or actual reading; verify material anchors when needed. Never claim to have read missing files.

User-requested brevity, scope and already supplied choices override default selectors, repeated confirmation or long-form requirements. Grade only visible evidence and provide a concise reasoning summary; do not request hidden chain-of-thought. Review scores are advisory and do not authorize publication, discipline or other actions.

Packaged Source Note

This AAS-ready copy preserves the original CrossFrame skill body below. Chinese remains the canonical semantic layer; English metadata is only for discovery, installation, and repository review.

Limitations