Idea Evaluator Orchestrator

Overview

The Idea Evaluator skill acts as an impartial judge for evaluating new concepts, features, or project ideas. It takes an initial idea from the user and orchestrates a structured, multi-turn debate between two simulated personas: a logical supporter (Pro Agent) and a constructive critic (Con Agent).

By pitting these two perspectives against each other, it surfaces the strongest arguments for both sides before delivering a comprehensive final verdict on whether the idea is worth building.

When to Use This Skill

• Use when you have a new idea but don't know if it's worth your time or effort to build.
• Use when evaluating potential features for a product to decide on priorities.
• Use when you want to rigorously stress-test an assumption before committing code.

Use simulated personas by default; actual agent spawning/messaging requires authorization and available tools. Debate is not validation: label observed evidence, assumptions and unresolved questions separately, cite primary sources for volatile market/technical claims and never invent customer demand or economics. A provisional verdict may be “insufficient evidence”; finish with the cheapest falsifiable test and decision threshold rather than forced certainty. Read both bundled persona files before using their roles.

How It Works

When triggered with an idea, you (the AI) will act as the Orchestrator and facilitate the following workflow: