project-referee
Project Referee
Review Workflow
Step 1: Assess Manuscript Stage
Ask or determine the manuscript stage:
- Early draft: Focus on novelty, feasibility, relevance, structure
- Mid-stage draft: Focus on development trajectory, completeness, preliminary results
- Final submission: Apply full review criteria (see references/reviewer-instructions.md)
Step 2: Stage-Specific Review
Early Draft Protocol:
- Assess core contribution novelty and significance
- Evaluate method feasibility with current technology
- Check alignment with venue scope
- Review logical structure and completeness
- Identify major missing components
More from sundial-org/skills
icml-reviewer
|
82cs-research-methodology
Conduct a literature review and develop a CS research proposal. Use when asked to review a research area, find gaps in existing work, and propose a novel research contribution. The output is a research proposal identifying an assumption to challenge (the "bit flip") and how to validate it.
58training-data-curation
Guidelines for creating high-quality datasets for LLM post-training (SFT/DPO/RLHF). Use when preparing data for fine-tuning, evaluating data quality, or designing data collection strategies.
58ai-co-scientist
Transform Claude Code into an AI Scientist that orchestrates research workflows using tree-based hypothesis exploration. Triggers on "research project", "scientific experiment", "run experiments", "AI scientist", "tree search experimentation", "systematic study".
54tinker
Fine-tune LLMs using the Tinker API. Covers supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, LoRA training, vision-language models, and both high-level Cookbook patterns and low-level API usage.
53commit-splitter
Split large sets of uncommitted changes into logical, well-organized commits. Use when the user has many uncommitted changes and wants structured commits, or proactively suggest when detecting a large diff that would benefit from splitting.
49