flip-assumptions
Installation
SKILL.md
Follow these steps:
1. Identify the claim
Target: $ARGUMENTS, else the claim in the current context.
2. Identify the conditional structure
Locate the underlying "if P then Q". It often hides in causal language ("X causes Y"), categorical statements ("all X are Y"), or implied relationships ("X means Y"). Make the conditional explicit.
3. Form the contrapositive
Negate both parts and reverse them: "if not-Q then not-P". This is logically equivalent to the original.
4. Compare verification difficulty
Which form is easier to test against evidence? The original may require proving something exists; the contrapositive, that something is absent. One direction often reveals clearer evidence paths.