Review Protocols

The core asymmetry

A reviewer asked to find problems will find them whether or not they exist. A skeptic asked to prove the code is fine finds the guard clause the reviewer missed.

So: generate findings with one set of agents, then hand each finding to independent verifiers prompted to refute it. Only findings that survive get reported.

This is not redundancy. Three reviewers all asked "is this buggy?" produce correlated errors. One reviewer plus two refuters produce an actual test.

Lens separation

Give each reviewer a narrow mandate. A lens that comments on everything dilutes into style commentary, and the real defect gets lost in it.