plan-docs
Fail
Audited by Gen Agent Trust Hub on Sep 15, 2026
Risk Level: HIGHCOMMAND_EXECUTIONINDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
Full Analysis
- [COMMAND_EXECUTION]: The script
scripts/plans.pyusessubprocess.run()to execute shell commands, specifically for Git operations.\n - Evidence: Static analysis flagged
subprocess.run()calls inscripts/plans.pythat execute via the system shell.\n - Risk: The skill instructions specify that the script accepts arguments from the user and processed files, including topic names (
new <topic>), status descriptions (blocked on <reason>), and commit messages (commit -m "<msg>"). These inputs are often supplied by the user or read from plan files. If not correctly sanitized before being passed to a shell, shell metacharacters (e.g.,;,&&,|) could be used to execute arbitrary commands on the host system.\n- [INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION]: The skill ingests and processes untrusted data from markdown plan files which could contain malicious instructions for the AI agent.\n - Ingestion points: The skill reads and "absorbs" content from
plans/*.mdfiles in the repository and the central$PLANS_HOMEstore via theabsorbcommand.\n - Boundary markers: The skill does not implement explicit delimiters or "ignore instructions" warnings for processed file content when summarizing or taking actions based on plan content.\n
- Capability inventory: The
scripts/plans.pyscript has the capability to write files, modify system configuration ($PLAN_DOCS_CONFIG), and execute shell commands via Git.\n - Sanitization: No sanitization of file content is performed to prevent prompt injection beyond a privacy scanner that looks for specific terms.
Recommendations
- AI detected serious security threats
Audit Metadata