reply-to-pr-conversation
Reply to PR Conversation
Draft a single reply that addresses a processed issue-comment list, confirm with the user, and post it as a new PR issue comment.
Step 1: Run /github-voice Skill
Run the /github-voice skill to load voice rules and the insider-vs-outsider detection.
Step 2: Compose the Reply
Use the processed-item list from conversation context. Each entry has: id, author, original comment body (to quote from selectively), category (fix, skip, answer, or clarify), and per-category payload.
Draft one reply that addresses every item as natural conversational prose. The output is a single piece of prose with flexible length and no rigid section structure.
Use the category to interpret each payload:
- fix: payload is a commit SHA. Mention "fixed in
<sha>" where it fits the flow, plus a brief note when the fix diverges from what the commenter suggested. - skip: payload is the skip reasoning. State it directly.
- answer: payload is answer text prepared upstream. Integrate it as the implementer's own words.
More from tobihagemann/turbo
find-dead-code
Find dead code using parallel subagent analysis and optional CLI tools, treating code only referenced from tests as dead. Use when the user asks to \"find dead code\", \"find unused code\", \"find unused exports\", \"find unreferenced functions\", \"clean up dead code\", or \"what code is unused\". Analysis-only — does not modify or delete code.
31simplify-code
Run a multi-agent review of changed files for reuse, quality, efficiency, and clarity issues followed by automated fixes. Use when the user asks to \"simplify code\", \"review changed code\", \"check for code reuse\", \"review code quality\", \"review efficiency\", \"simplify changes\", \"clean up code\", \"refactor changes\", or \"run simplify\".
24investigate
Systematically investigate bugs, test failures, build errors, performance issues, or unexpected behavior by cycling through characterize-isolate-hypothesize-test steps. Use when the user asks to \"investigate this bug\", \"debug this\", \"figure out why this fails\", \"find the root cause\", \"why is this broken\", \"troubleshoot this\", \"diagnose the issue\", \"what's causing this error\", \"look into this failure\", \"why is this test failing\", or \"track down this bug\".
23smoke-test
Launch the app and hands-on verify that it works by interacting with it. Use when the user asks to \"smoke test\", \"test it manually\", \"verify it works\", \"try it out\", \"run a smoke test\", \"check it in the browser\", or \"does it actually work\". Not for unit/integration tests.
23finalize
Run the post-implementation quality assurance workflow including tests, code polishing, review, and commit. Use when the user asks to \"finalize implementation\", \"finalize changes\", \"wrap up implementation\", \"finish up\", \"ready to commit\", or \"run QA workflow\".
23evaluate-findings
Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to \"evaluate findings\", \"assess review comments\", \"triage review feedback\", \"evaluate review output\", or \"filter false positives\".
23