uipath-rpa
Audited by Socket on Apr 29, 2026
4 alerts found:
Anomalyx4No clear evidence of intentional malware (no obfuscation, no explicit exfiltration, no backdoor/persistence logic) is present in the shown example fragment. However, it contains multiple high-impact security sinks typical of serious abuse scenarios—remote script execution on a VM, UiPath Robot configuration using credential-like values, Secret Manager secret retrieval, IAM role/policy modification, and destructive GCS/Compute Engine operations. The dominant supply-chain security concern is misuse/over-privilege risk if any of the script/config/identifiers were attacker-influenced or overly permissive in deployment.
SUSPICIOUS. The skill is broadly aligned with UiPath project authoring, but its footprint is powerful: it can modify many project files, install packages, run/build automations, and autonomously continue based on repo-controlled plans. The main concerns are autonomous real-world actions, transitive agent invocation, and prompt-injection risk from acting on mutable project content; there is no clear evidence of credential theft or malicious exfiltration.
No direct malicious payload behavior is evident in the provided fragment (no obfuscated/dynamic execution, persistence, or non-email exfiltration). However, the examples show patterns that can be security sensitive in real deployments: hardcoded credentials, logging of message metadata, forwarding of attacker-controlled message content, and high-impact mailbox mutations (delete/move/save) driven by email subject/content. These are primarily operational/compositional risks rather than clear signs of intentional malware.
No strong evidence of intentional malware (backdoor, persistence, reverse shell, or attacker-controlled exfiltration) is present in this fragment. The primary security concerns are credential/secret management and information exposure: hardcoded ZIP/credential passwords, logging of derived secret material (API key substring/username), and propagation of exception messages into orchestrator/queue failure details. Additionally, the code demonstrates high-impact filesystem/storage mutations and ZIP extraction without shown path validation, which warrants hardening if adapted beyond examples.